I don’t know how feasible these would be in a game, but if you’re playing something scenario based I think they would be a real visual treat protecting an emplacement. The question I have is who has used them, are they useful and worth taking and which of the variants are the most sucessful on the table?
Any information or suggestions on their performance would be great.
Cheers
2 comments:
I've only used them n 5th ed, though the new artillery rules rules for 6th will probably make them more survivable. Mine have the quad stubbers (2 built, 1 still in need of assembly) and are great for taking down infantry, even marines. Its best way to think of the quad stubber platforms as long ranged, accurate, mass bolter fire. True they're only AP6, but most opponents are Spess Mahreenz, so its a moot point.
I highly recommend them.
I like the look of the quad stubbers, but I'm not sure about the platform.
I might lean towards something more like the ZPU-4
http://www.armyrecognition.com/russia_russian_army_light_heavy_weapons_uk/zpu-4_14.5_mm_quadruple_guns_anti-aircraft_technical_data_sheet_specifications_information_uk.html
or the M-51 quad 50's
http://www.100thww2.org/support/898/898m51.html
It's too bad heavy stubbers are relatively expensive bits. I mat have to scratch build one of these.
Post a Comment